Win some, lose some.
Fortunately, AMO is far more familiar with winning in the difficult game of
government
contracts. Our union has picked up or kept most of the officers' jobs
resulting from vessel
operating charters awarded to U.S.-flag companies by the Navy's Military
Sealift
Command.
But, in mid-July, AMO was on both sides of the divide.
First, we learned that Dyn Marine Services, a Virginia-based AMO employer,
will continue
to operate eight T-AGOR oceanographic vessels. The T-AGORs are the USNS
Henson,
USNS Kane, USNS Silas Bent, USNS Little Hales, USNS McDonnell, USNS Sumner,
USNS Bowditch and USNS Pathfinder. A ninth vessel is
forthcoming.
The award was satisfying not only because it meant continued work for AMO
professionals, but because it gave us an opportunity to win wage increases,
substantial
benefit gains, and other contract improvements in the growing specialized
fleet.
The disappointment came later, when we learned that MSC had awarded a
five-year charter
to American Ship Management, or ASM, for the operation of 11 large,
medium-speed roll-
on/roll-off ships. ASM is the former American President Line, and the
company does not
employ AMO in any capacity.
Included in the charter were five converted LMSRs now operated for MSC by
Bay Ship
Management and manned in all licensed positions by AMO. The ships--USNS
Shughart,
USNS Gordon, USNS Yano, USNS Gilliland and USNS
Soderman--will be turned over
to ASM in 2001.
Also included were vessels under construction or on order at Avondale in
New Orleans and
National Steel and Shipbuilding Co., or NASSCO, in San Diego.
AMO jobs on the newly built LSMRs already delivered from Avondale and
NASSCO will
not be lost. AMO will continue to provide the licensed officers on the
USNS Bob Hope,
USNS George Watson, USNS Sisler and USNS Dahl.
The LMSR project began after Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm in
1990 and
1991. During the Persian Gulf mobilization and war, the Department of
Defense learned
that the U.S. was perilously short of roll-on/roll-off sealift capacity for the movement of
heavy unit equipment, vehicles, and other rolling stock to overseas flashpoints.
DOD determined that it needed a 19-ship LMSR fleet, and it launched a
three-stage program
to accomplish that--the acquisition and conversion of five existing ships,
construction of
eight more, and, later, construction of the last
six.
The operating charter for the five conversions went to Bay, and the charter
for the first
eight newbuildings--four in the Bob Hope class, four in the Watson
class--went to
Maersk. No bids had yet been solicited for the operation of the last six
LMSRs when the
Maersk award was made.
Then the mix changed. MSC issued a single Request For Proposals, or RFP,
for the five
conversions and six newbuildings--including, apparently, some of the Hope
and Watson
ships first awarded to Maersk. As of Aug. 1, it was still uncertain how
many LMSRs
Maersk Line Ltd. will end up with.
These developments confirm what we have said many times--competition for MSC
charters is increasingly fierce, and non-union companies and ship operators
who have
collective bargaining agreements with other officers' unions are beginning
to bid
aggressively. That is important because, in a shift that began in the
Reagan administration,
MSC now accounts for most of the ocean-going jobs available to civilian
merchant marine
officers and crews.
But the LMSR setback does not diminish AMO's status as MSC's largest
supplier of
engine, deck, and radio-electronics officers. It does not affect AMO's
standing as the
nation's strongest officers' union: we have jobs for members who want to
work at sea, and
there are many more on the way; our treasury and our benefit funds
continue to grow; we
have unrivaled opportunities in current and forthcoming trades.
AMO will continue to review the LMSR charter twist and to monitor the
entire complicated
RFP process. I welcome your comments.
|